Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 03:16
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 122
2-Core 230
86% 148 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 658
70% 548 Pts
64-Core 781
52% 781 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.53
6% 8.91 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 16.2
7% 12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,376
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 178
Parallax 207
136% 185 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 186
Splatting 126
150% 168 fps
Poor: 140%
This bench: 143%
Great: 198%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1000 794 800 803 801 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,963
Write 1,772
Mixed 1,459
SusWrite 930
343% 1,531 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 64.7
210% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 1,255
DQ Mixed 1,064
819% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 251%
Great: 278%
Samsung PSSD T7 Touch 1TB
533GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 547 559 565 536 540 548 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 480
Write 520
Mixed 462
SusWrite 549
114% 503 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 25.6
82% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 31.3
50% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
80% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 25.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 5,976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback