HP ZBook 17

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP ZBook 17 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 190A
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '20 at 18:55
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150 22,632 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 152 57% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 388 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3100M 2,978 User benchmarks, average bench 11% HP(103C 190A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1917 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	6.29% Terrible	Lighting 6.57 Reflection 6.54 Parallax 8.03 5% 7.05 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 9.33 Splatting 10.1 8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.29% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB 5,641 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUFA SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 124 136 153 179 265 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 465 Write 177 Mixed 175 SusWrite 165 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 34.9 104% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 94 DQ Mixed 138 103% 139 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 265GB free Firmware: AV0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 122 123 124 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 120 Mixed 52 SusWrite 123 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 13.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 14.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

CPU
Core i7-4800MQIntel $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples	72x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	56x
Core i7-4900MQIntel $110Bench 68%, 5,651 samples	18x

GPU
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	114x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	31x
Quadro K5100MNvidiaBench 21%, 641 samples	24x

SSD
MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	15x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	13x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $296

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16