Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 53.4 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 61 31% 46.9 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 106 15% 108 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2AFC) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 3.81 Parallax 2.47 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 113 115 116 118 162 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.2% Poor	Read 181 Write 107 Mixed 90.4 SusWrite 130 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 10.7 44% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 17.3 DQ Mixed 14.7 12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 5.3 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16