Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '20 at 17:17
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 71 2-Core 139 60% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 314 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.4% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 73.9 Parallax 102 47% 77.6 fps	MRender 77.8 Gravity 81.7 Splatting 48 54% 69.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 76 75 75 77 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 177 Write 172 Mixed 167 SusWrite 77.1 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 24.5 73% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 43.9 35% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 103 103 103 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 158 Write 143 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 104 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 872GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 150 150 151 151 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 151 Write 144 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 150 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 897 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID c75d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 5.4 6.9 8.6 8.6 8.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	7.43% Terrible	Read 25 Write 8.1 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 7.6 11% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 45% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.43% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 9.3 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	531x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	255x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	157x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	447x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	259x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16