Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 13:39
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 391
53% 390 Pts
64-Core 386
26% 386 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
Gigabyte(1458 3FC5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Lighting 319
Reflection 248
Parallax 284
84% 284 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 269
Splatting 177
76% 223 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$55
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 239 238 240 240 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76.5% Very good
Read 254
Write 244
Mixed 246
SusWrite 239
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 42.3
137% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 128%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
80GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 221 243 247 247 248 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.1% Good
Read 256
Write 246
Mixed 208
SusWrite 240
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 30.8
104% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 60
83% 152 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$15
174GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 130 132 130 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 121
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 130
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 3,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $185
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback