MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '20 at 12:41
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 70.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 219 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 680 67% 548 Pts	64-Core 1,141 71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 130 Reflection 143 Parallax 131 106% 135 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 128 Splatting 107 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 746 523 527 519 512 506 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,738 Write 1,536 Mixed 556 SusWrite 556 244% 1,096 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 41.4 135% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 707 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 482 364% 500 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 254%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 219GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 168 172 169 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 171 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 170 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.1 288% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 145 146 144 141 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 132 Write 158 Mixed 93 SusWrite 146 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1 285% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 38GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 91 98 92 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 86 Write 100 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 93.3 66% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.9 225% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 105%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 17GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 60 73 68 64 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 49.7 Write 71 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 64.8 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 70GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 153 154 151 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 78 Write 51 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 152 63% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 96%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 44GB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 152 149 144 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 130 Write 134 Mixed 32 SusWrite 149 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.2% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 23.8 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 21.6 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	250x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	225x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	180x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $915

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16