Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 23 '20 at 23:54
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-6100-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 96.5
51% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 211
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 198
13% 198 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
MSI(1462 2570) 1.2GB
CLim: 770 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 117
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 74.8
31% 89.9 fps
MRender 82.7
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 62.5
20% 69.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$75
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 188 229 223 211 193 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 79.2
Write 207
Mixed 221
SusWrite 202
41% 177 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 9.1
40% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 52.1
DQ Mixed 5.6
12% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 124%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
122GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 47 46 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 46.3
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Write 1.8
100% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 48%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$33
182GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 80 79 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 27.3
Write 100
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 77.8
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0
42% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 5,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $707
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback