Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ (all builds)
Memory	17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140117
Uptime	62.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '20 at 15:33
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81 13,306 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 59 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 108 48% 79 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 105 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 106 6% 106 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 1288) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.65 Parallax 3.69 3% 3.71 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5.17 4% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 352 351 366 371 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Read 419 Write 369 Mixed 337 SusWrite 356 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 42.2 132% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 222 166% 221 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 134%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 123 126 125 125 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 116 Write 109 Mixed 79.9 SusWrite 124 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 86%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 137 138 138 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 130 Write 37.5 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 138 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown QLA304G08-GGN QLA304G08-GGN Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.8% Poor	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	19x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	11x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x

SSD
S101 256GBFanxiangBench 63%, 810 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	4x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $375

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16