Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '20 at 12:15
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 37 2-Core 68.6 39% 57.7 Pts	4-Core 60.9 8-Core 72.5 9% 66.7 Pts	64-Core 61.5 4% 61.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 8D95) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.9% Above average	Lighting 75.8 Reflection 70.3 Parallax 69.7 62% 71.9 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 67.4 Splatting 54.1 50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 121 31 124 108 117 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.1% Poor	Read 194 Write 130 Mixed 116 SusWrite 100 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 8.6 37% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 24.2 DQ Mixed 15.6 14% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 55%
Verbatim STORE N GO 2GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0304 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.3 3.8 3.5 3.2 3.7 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.2% Terrible	Read 16 Write 8 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.3 8% 7.25 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.2% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6BFR8C-G7 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 44GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1066, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	227x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	49x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	37x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	231x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	62x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	32x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	9x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	8x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 44GBUnknownBench 21%, 16 samples	6x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16