DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100512
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 09:30
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-950-$286
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 113
62% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 219
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 215
14% 215 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Zotac(19DA 3451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 216
Reflection 185
Parallax 213
57% 204 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 206
Splatting 163
57% 173 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
287GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 32 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 32.2
Mixed 33
SusWrite 31.2
7% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 7.3
25% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$71
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 69 73 60 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 85.8
Mixed 45
SusWrite 63
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$33
266GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 108 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 76
SusWrite 107
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 1,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback