Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '17 at 16:30
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 4450e 686 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 37.3 2-Core 64.9 37% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 64.5 8-Core 74.6 9% 69.6 Pts	64-Core 78.6 5% 78.6 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 4,580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% POV(1ACC 0857) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 0.31 1% 0.98 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.4% Very poor	Read 120 Write 48.7 Mixed 58.2 17% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.28 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 7.34 28% 8.54 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 6.35 9% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 536GB free Firmware: HP34 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 163 Mixed 158 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.29 86% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 112%
Seagate ST380013AS 80GB-$75 2,837 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 24GB free Firmware: 3.00 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 42.9 Write 41.9 Mixed 39.4 31% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.41 85% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST51264BA1339.16FK 1x4GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM 533 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	21x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	17x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	11x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	8x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	3x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $85

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16