Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38 10,428 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 33.2 1-Core 28 2-Core 50 23% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 64.7 8-Core 74.9 9% 69.8 Pts	64-Core 76.4 5% 76.4 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 9460) CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	20.2% Poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 28.7 19% 26.2 fps	MRender 26.7 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 30 22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 138 53 53 53 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 136 Write 111 Mixed 107 SusWrite 97.2 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 10.6 43% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 37 DQ Mixed 19.3 17% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 1.1 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16