Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190327
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '20 at 01:37
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 1,907 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 512 54% 431 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2762) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 36.3 26% 33.1 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 34.9 Splatting 34.2 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 40 39 45 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 308 Write 31.3 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 49 25% 117 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 18.6 79% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 52.9 78% 155 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 85%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 456GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 72GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 409 402 412 385 366 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 664 Write 399 Mixed 187 SusWrite 379 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 26.3 102% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 189 180% 279 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 129%
Mass Storage Device 8GB 2,579 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	7.62% Terrible	Read 18 Write 16.2 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 17.9 19% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.62% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB 1,961 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.7% Excellent	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 30.7 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 20.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	415x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16