Acer Aspire M3910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M3910 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M3910
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '20 at 00:07
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 68.5 1-Core 69.8 2-Core 120 52% 86 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 191 20% 163 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Lighting 45.4 Reflection 44.9 Parallax 40.1 37% 43.5 fps	MRender 39.7 Gravity 41 Splatting 36.7 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HCS721010CLA332 1TB 407 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 828GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 108 121 123 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 130 Write 130 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 110 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 77%
Seagate ST3160815SV 160GB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 75GB free Firmware: 3.ACF SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 62 61 60 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 72.5 Write 70.2 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 61.2 45% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 41%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 5,616 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.1 2.7 2.4 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Read 16 Write 0.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 2.3 5% 5.72 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.1% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3910 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3910

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	62x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	28x

GPU
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	20x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	13x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBUnknownBench 29%, 785 samples	5x
CT51264BD160B.C16F 4x4GBCrucialBench 50%, 640 samples	4x
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16