Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 20:14
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 174
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 247
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 30.6
28% 30 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 32.5
28% 34 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 8 14 17 81 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 342
Write 200
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 55.4
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 11.2
24% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 94.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 39.9
32% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 159 153 154 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 133
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 151
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
3GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.4 4.8 5.7 5 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 7.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.6
10% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 22.7
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback