Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.9% Average	Memory 71 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 68.3 39% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 65.9 8-Core 68.1 9% 67 Pts	64-Core 67.2 4% 67.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 7,025 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0254) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.92 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Stec MACH16 M16ISD2-100UCP-HUA 100GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00000403 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 86 87 88 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 117 Write 104 Mixed 107 SusWrite 84 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 18.2 78% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 91 DQ Write 30 DQ Mixed 50.7 40% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T8100Intel $78Bench 35%, 2,639 samples	6x
Core2 Duo T5750Intel $99Bench 32%, 2,050 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T5850IntelBench 32%, 471 samples	3x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3400ATIBench 1%, 7,025 samples	17x
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	4x
CS1311 120GBPNY $63Bench 75%, 12,393 samples	2x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $108

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16