Acer Predator PH317-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Alphard_CFS
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 02:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 227
85% 145 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 633
67% 522 Pts
64-Core 642
43% 642 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1342) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 233
Parallax 24.8
6% 93.8 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 21
Splatting 35.8
6% 26.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1342) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 216
Reflection 210
Parallax 127
57% 184 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 200
Splatting 148
60% 188 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 75%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 975 596 590 570 571 535 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 936
Write 1,699
Mixed 1,222
SusWrite 639
255% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 46.7
157% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 754
571% 774 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 160%
Great: 226%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
41GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 7,296
Write 5,508
Mixed 6,199
1,409% 6,334 MB/s
4K Read 607
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 276
1,376% 359 MB/s
DQ Read 1,564
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 888
729% 1063 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 129%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 103 101 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 112
Write 94.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 102
124% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
52% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.2% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 19.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Predator PH317-53 Builds (Compare 1,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: Acer Predator PH317-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback