Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 61.4 34% 51.1 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 271 26% 213 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 2.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 1TB free Firmware: 3.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 526 481 349 349 508 519 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	Read 1190 Write 1,300 Mixed 1,449 SusWrite 456 248% 1,099 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 20.5 82% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 211 141% 167 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 215%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 299GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 27 25 22 25 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 139 Write 28 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 26.2 44% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 77%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 843GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 21 Write 24 Mixed 20 SusWrite 24.9 31% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 24GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.7% Above average	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 23.3 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16