Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181105
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '20 at 00:15
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	90%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 28 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 145 44% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 647 51% 451 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.3% Below average	Lighting 51.2 Reflection 46.6 Parallax 44.9 42% 47.6 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 44.1 Splatting 43.2 34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE8512GNTD 512GB 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8TM24.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 311 331 294 223 244 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 368 Write 412 Mixed 390 SusWrite 284 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 14.1 46% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 683 DQ Write 385 DQ Mixed 314 292% 460 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 165%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 917GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 182 180 178 167 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 54.7 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 173 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 9.4 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	537x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	254x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	146x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	105x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	45x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	127x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	72x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $634

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16