HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190820
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMar 20 '20 at 23:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,048
97% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.6% Very good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 83.5
Parallax 76.6
74% 83.6 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 67.6
64% 79.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 275 273 281 302 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 736
Write 299
Mixed 438
SusWrite 288
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 51.9
163% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 373
310% 458 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
25GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 123 137 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 147
Write 149
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 130
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback