Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '20 at 23:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 148
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 454
43% 355 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
PNY(196E 1343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 52.8
Parallax 46.5
46% 52 fps
MRender 43.8
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 48.3
39% 47.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 150 72 50 33 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 382
Write 268
Mixed 368
SusWrite 92.4
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 37.8
132% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 180
146% 204 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
852GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 177 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 169
Mixed 102
SusWrite 176
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 142 143 143 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 153
Write 156
Mixed 109
SusWrite 143
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL F3-14900CL10-8GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback