Hp-pavilion AX300AV-ABA p6270z

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion AX300AV-ABA p6270z (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN ALOE
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091026
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,746 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 43.7 2-Core 87.2 47% 70.9 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 158 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 3.92 Parallax 4.06 4% 4.11 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 183 193 84 24 24 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56% Above average	Read 208 Write 157 Mixed 170 SusWrite 113 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 37.5 123% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 66.5 DQ Mixed 44.9 36% 49 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 188GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 60 64 71 71 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 89.7 Write 92.3 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 67.9 59% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.8 174% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 528GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 98 98 98 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 94.2 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 97.3 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 83%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 2092 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	0.31% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.4 1% 0.53 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.31% Great: 7%
ASMT 2115 128GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 7GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.4 1% 0.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 219%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.7% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 10.4 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AX300AV-ABA p6270z Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AX300AV-ABA p6270z

CPU
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	1x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNYBench 57%, 5 samples	1x
WDS2 00T2B0A-00SM50 2TBWDCBench 76%, 56 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	1x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 BLS2G3D1609DS1S00. BLS2G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 4 samples	1x
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. 16GBUnknownBench 31%, 19 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16