Lenovo 80ST

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80ST (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Toronto 5B1
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170417
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '20 at 13:56
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9800P APU (2016 M.BR) 3,040 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 51.2 2-Core 70.8 41% 61.8 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 148 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 380A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Lighting 6.27 Reflection 7.62 Parallax 8.75 5% 7.54 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 7.23 Splatting 4.52 4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB 14,793 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 183 188 196 225 229 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 336 Write 254 Mixed 273 SusWrite 210 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 17.4 87% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 131 102% 140 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 93%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB 3,447 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 76GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 101 101 100 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 82.5 Write 85 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 102 56% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80ST Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80ST

CPU
A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 33%, 13,243 samples	62x
A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 34%, 5,770 samples	47x
FX-9800P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 36%, 3,040 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	62x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	51x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	2x

RAM
RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 12GBRamaxelBench 22%, 358 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 467 samples	20x
M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 321 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16