PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z210 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1587h |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121127 |
Uptime | 1.5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '20 at 10:20 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
78.6%
Very good
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 350 347 349 345 345 MB/s
|
95.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B5773DH0-CH9 M391B5273DH0-CH9 M391B5773DH0-CH9 W-HPL1600E8G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 8192 MB
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 341x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 121x |
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples | 115x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 107x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $223 |