Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 44.4
28% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 84.3
8-Core 140
14% 112 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
PwrHis(1787 A480) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 86.8
26% 53.9 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 54.3
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 174 157 144 123 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 363
Write 360
Mixed 310
SusWrite 163
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 26.1
83% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 132
99% 131 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
904GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 199 199 201 199 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 166
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 195
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2
365% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
149GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 95 100 100 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 54.5
Write 97
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 96
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 109%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76
Write 25.2
Mixed 49.2
57% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
121% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback