Asus PRIME H310M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '20 at 08:42
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 71.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 242 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 392 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 557 34% 557 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8641) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.2% Above average	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 71.2 Parallax 62.3 58% 68.2 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 67.3 Splatting 69 56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 85 41 59 19 77 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 450 Write 141 Mixed 102 SusWrite 49.3 40% 186 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 17.7 101% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 83.6 DQ Mixed 116 104% 162 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 137 150 140 138 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 104 Write 135 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 143 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.1 51% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB 3,973 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 10.4 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.4 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K Builds (Compare 2,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	709x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	440x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	331x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	300x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	262x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	145x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	263x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	87x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	80x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	52x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	37x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $292

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16