Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7600-$130 622 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 60.2 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 43.5 30% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 43.3 8-Core 46.5 6% 44.9 Pts	64-Core 49.7 3% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 2500M 62 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 019B) 512MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7967 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.06 1% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 41 66 75 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 80 Write 62.8 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 64 16% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 10.9 32% 9.57 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 18.5 14% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 3500NvidiaBench 1%, 426 samples	5x
Quadro FX 1500MNvidiaBench 1%, 59 samples	1x

SSD
Q Series Pro 128GBToshiba $66Bench 82%, 2,808 samples	1x
SSDNow KC400 128GBKingston $75Bench 82%, 747 samples	1x
PLUS 120 GB 120GBSandiskBench 42%, 14,313 samples	1x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $196

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16