Fujitsu CELSIUS H730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H730  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB274
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140203
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 16:06
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$541
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 44.1
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 187
60% 110 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 431
48% 371 Pts
64-Core 426
29% 426 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
Fujitsu(10CF 17EF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2632
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
9.18% Terrible
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 34.8
8% 28.5 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 22.5
9% 26.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.18%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 197 196 184 174 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66% Good
Read 217
Write 214
Mixed 200
SusWrite 192
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 33.9
120% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 171
134% 184 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66%
Great: 125%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
149GB free
Firmware: HTFAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 333 361 370 370 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 396
Write 362
Mixed 357
SusWrite 362
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 27.1
87% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 325
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 137
Write 144
Mixed 110
SusWrite 80.1
157% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 96%
WD Elements 2TB
666GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 118 118 116 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 89.7
Write 97.2
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 117
128% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 5.9
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CELSIUS H730 Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $484
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback