Asus P7H55-M/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100901
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '20 at 12:47
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 880 808 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 97.1 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 178 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 471 53% 414 Pts	64-Core 476 30% 476 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 4001) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 145 Parallax 148 114% 144 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 133 Splatting 109 113% 143 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 153 154 154 153 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.4% Above average	Read 191 Write 147 Mixed 171 SusWrite 152 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 39.7 128% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 34.8 DQ Write 61.4 DQ Mixed 43.7 34% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 133%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 321GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 67 67 68 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 90.8 Write 90 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 67.3 92% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.5% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 13.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.9 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 50 80% 50 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M/USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	27x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	11x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	5x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	76x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16