HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '20 at 10:38
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 77.3 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 134 56% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 328 35% 277 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 176C) 2GB CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.23 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 8.75 6% 7.49 fps	MRender 9.95 Gravity 8.67 Splatting 10.9 8% 9.84 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 512GB 417 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQE1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 149 156 152 194 183 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.3% Below average	Read 214 Write 111 Mixed 127 SusWrite 177 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 11.8 47% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36 DQ Write 35.6 DQ Mixed 31.5 25% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 1.7 3.2 2.5 3.3 3.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.68% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 15.4 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 2.8 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.68% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 32GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.2% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 14.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16