Lenovo 20382

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20382 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo B50-30
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '20 at 07:35
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 24.4 2-Core 48.2 32% 44.9 Pts	4-Core 47.8 8-Core 48.2 6% 48 Pts	64-Core 47.4 3% 47.4 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3986) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.94 1% 1 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 83 54 51 56 54 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.9% Average	Read 212 Write 182 Mixed 170 SusWrite 76 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 23.3 72% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 93.6 DQ Mixed 108 82% 111 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 85%
Integral Neon USB 3.0 16GB-$14 844 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 8GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.9 7.2 7.2 8 7.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.29% Terrible	Read 38.1 Write 9.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 7.5 15% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.29% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5603-017.A00G KNWMX1-ETB 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.7 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20382 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20382

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	64x
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	43x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	31x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	142x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	28x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	16x
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 26%, 6,848 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16