Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-64 193 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 59.9 33% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 61.8 8-Core 60.8 8% 61.3 Pts	64-Core 60.8 4% 60.8 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 028D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 0.48 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.74 0% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 142 129 55 61 54 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 225 Write 174 Mixed 174 SusWrite 93.3 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 10.5 51% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 106 80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMN1740EC48D8W-800 2x2GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16