Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario RR791AA-AKV SR2104LA (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Alhena5
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20061225
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 41.9 1-Core 20.4 2-Core 39.2 23% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 34.8 8-Core 40 5% 37.4 Pts	64-Core 39.1 2% 39.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 122 119 120 120 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 116 Write 122 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 121 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.72% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.4 5% 1.87 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 1.3 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.72% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16