Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190807
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '20 at 05:00
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 43.9 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 46.9 26% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 84.7 8-Core 188 16% 137 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3712) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.59 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	62.7% Good	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 52.7 Parallax 120 27% 68.7 fps	MRender 197 Gravity 180 Splatting 121 131% 166 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 809GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 798 736 711 734 760 825 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 852 Write 828 Mixed 718 SusWrite 761 178% 790 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 15.8 58% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 418 DQ Mixed 261 230% 342 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 295%
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2TB free Firmware: JKAOA31E SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 130 125 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 124 Write 119 Mixed 61 SusWrite 127 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x16GB 1,575 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	47.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 22.8 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	528x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	317x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	210x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	200x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	157x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	131x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	74x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	58x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	44x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	107x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16