PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190313 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '20 at 00:03 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 90% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
56%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 119 136 128 119 122 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
118GB free
Firmware: 0006HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 77 78 72 78 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST9500325ASG 500GB
416GB free
Firmware: 0009APM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 66 62 55 58 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
8GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.4 8.4 8.9 7.9 9.8 MB/s
|
6.51%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.4%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 527x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 316x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 210x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples | 200x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 157x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 131x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $758 |