HP Pavilion dv9000 (EZ458UA#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP Pavilion dv9000 (EZ458UA#ABA) (all builds)
Motherboard	Quanta 30B9
Memory	1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100322
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '20 at 08:53
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50 289 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket S1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Memory 20.3 1-Core 11 2-Core 22.6 12% 18 Pts	4-Core 21.7 8-Core 21.5 3% 21.6 Pts	64-Core 21.6 1% 21.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6150 240 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 30B7) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 259.47 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.08 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.08 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.05% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 40 13 28 38 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 43.2 Write 48.5 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 32.2 28% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 32%
Seagate ST9100824AS 100GB-$68 288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 70GB free Firmware: 7.24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 35 36 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 35.4 Write 35.5 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 35.2 24% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 5,058 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4 4 4.3 4.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 11.8 Mixed 13.6 SusWrite 4.1 15% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2 126% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 17%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 1.7 5 5.2 5.3 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Read 8.3 Write 0.8 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 4.2 4% 3.78 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	4.52% Terrible	MC Read 1.4 MC Write 1.4 MC Mixed 1.4 4% 1.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 0.9 GB/s	Latency 319 13% 319 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Pavilion dv9000 (EZ458UA#ABA)

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)