HP Notebook

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81E5
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '20 at 07:18
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 50.7 1-Core 27.7 2-Core 55.1 29% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 107 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 106 7% 106 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 81E5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 2.84 2% 3.11 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.83 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BHT WR202HH064G E70215F5 63GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 150100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 22 19 21 19 22 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 109 Write 74.3 Mixed 71 SusWrite 25 16% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 4.7 27% 8.53 MB/s	DQ Read 13.3 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 8.9 8% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 24%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 49GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.8 8.4 9.2 9 8.4 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 30 Write 7 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 8.9 18% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.5 154% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1.5TB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 24.3 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 21.5 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 6.7 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	1,144x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	1,029x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	985x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,495x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,737x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	152x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	150x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	377x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16