Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-1250 APU 724 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Memory 23.2 1-Core 14.4 2-Core 29.3 14% 22.3 Pts	4-Core 19.8 8-Core 24.7 3% 22.2 Pts	64-Core 26.7 2% 26.7 Pts
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 080D) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 1.44 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 219 244 231 266 268 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 309 Write 277 Mixed 284 SusWrite 244 63% 279 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 13.7 55% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 59.7 DQ Write 54.7 DQ Mixed 55.9 42% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF186D.M16 HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 933, 800 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 298 13% 298 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 10%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-1450 APUAMDBench 22%, 558 samples	13x
A4-1250 APUAMDBench 17%, 724 samples	10x

GPU
HD 8250AMDBench 1%, 1,387 samples	13x
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 4GBKingstonBench 10%, 139 samples	3x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Elpida 4GBUnknownBench 9%, 108 samples	3x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G Elpida 4GBKingstonBench 10%, 68 samples	3x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16