PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X99 Extreme11 (all builds) |
Memory | 29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141001 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 14 '20 at 10:59 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
|
21.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 271 262 267 260 263 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
754GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 111 110 107 105 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
WD My Book 1170 2TB
647GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 90 88 90 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 8x |
Xeon E5-2690 v3IntelBench 72%, 1,130 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-2660 v3IntelBench 70%, 1,203 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $845 |