Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 19:41
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 190
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 363
46% 351 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
MSI(1462 259D) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.25
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 3%
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 30.2
22% 27.5 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 30.3
22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 417 423 423 423 425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 470
Write 394
Mixed 392
SusWrite 421
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 24.6
106% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 38.2
87% 174 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
465GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 129 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 122
Write 125
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 128
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
904GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 98 96 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 97.2
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 97.2
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
267GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 127
Write 117
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 92.5
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20
149GB free
Firmware: 3.AMC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 75 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 72.1
Write 73.5
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 74.4
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $585
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback