Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8603
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191209
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 141 2-Core 267 94% 167 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 944 88% 734 Pts	64-Core 1,155 72% 1,155 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile) 4,380 User benchmarks, average bench 112% HP(103C 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 160 Parallax 147 119% 151 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 131 Splatting 109 111% 141 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 824GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 1291 1636 1637 1484 1538 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	286% Outstanding	Read 1,427 Write 2,028 Mixed 1128 SusWrite 1,381 337% 1,491 MB/s	4K Read 66.7 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 91 299% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,231 DQ Write 1,068 DQ Mixed 1159 866% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 286% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 677GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1925 2005 1389 1227 1251 1224 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	299% Outstanding	Read 1,463 Write 1,867 Mixed 844 SusWrite 1,503 320% 1,420 MB/s	4K Read 66.2 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 91.1 302% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,304 DQ Write 1,142 DQ Mixed 1,220 915% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 299% Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$120 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 357 428 445 439 443 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 381 Mixed 366 SusWrite 386 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 41.3 131% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 250 203% 289 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB 10,266 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 29.1 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 26.1 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples	447x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	411x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	318x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	258x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	207x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	97x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	378x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	120x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	113x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16