Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120131
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '20 at 23:40
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 95.3 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 157 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 472 43% 363 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Palit(1569 13C0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Lighting 82.5 Reflection 83.4 Parallax 80.5 67% 82.2 fps	MRender 78.4 Gravity 74.2 Splatting 65.7 59% 72.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 400 Write 343 Mixed 8.5 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.2 20% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 11GB free Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 71 71 62 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 103 Write 81.3 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 65.3 20% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 15.2 60% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 12.1 DQ Mixed 16.9 13% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 51%
Intenso Sata III 480GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 39GB free Firmware: P0510E SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 71 71 63 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 333 Write 306 Mixed 272 SusWrite 65.5 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 26.5 96% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 67 DQ Mixed 29.3 27% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 101%
Samsung HM250JI 250GB 961 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 60GB free Firmware: HS100-08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 46.5 Write 49.7 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 33.9 30% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 5,533 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 21.4 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 13.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 56 71% 56 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	40x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	39x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	22x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	11x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16