Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 81 2-Core 155 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 432 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B E347) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.4% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 60.1 Parallax 92.1 53% 72.5 fps	MRender 66 Gravity 67.8 Splatting 54.9 51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75 15,430 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 116 116 99 100 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41% Average	Read 280 Write 134 Mixed 180 SusWrite 109 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 13.3 4K Mixed 20 65% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 98.8 DQ Mixed 35.2 35% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 77%
Micron_M510_MTFDDAV128MAZ 128GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 111GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 109 117 116 100 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 301 Write 170 Mixed 188 SusWrite 111 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 23.6 88% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 98.4 DQ Mixed 37.5 36% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 86%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 52GB free Firmware: 505ABBF1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 72 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 368 Write 85 Mixed 131 SusWrite 72.5 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 24.2 96% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 72.8 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 66.2 53% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 69%
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 57GB free Firmware: FSPAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 113 170 87 111 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 346 Write 388 Mixed 222 SusWrite 123 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 24.7 65% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 160 117% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 90%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 134 135 134 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 140 Write 131 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 134 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 88%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 302GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 88 84 83 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 125 Write 147 Mixed 18 SusWrite 84.4 67% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.3% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 5.4 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16