Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA720
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 20:46
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 58%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 52
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 128
37% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 446
42% 352 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 3000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 49.5
Parallax 2.44
2% 18.2 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 370 329 338 368 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,024
Write 1,024
Mixed 364
SusWrite 363
155% 694 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 31.7
102% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 314
272% 409 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 115%
Great: 228%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
502GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 756 959 1107 1185 1364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 928
Write 177
Mixed 279
SusWrite 1,012
133% 599 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 34.7
102% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 261
243% 380 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 151%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback