Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '17 at 20:20
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 129 2-Core 255 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 931 87% 723 Pts	64-Core 1344 83% 1344 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 117 Parallax 116 90% 114 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 103 Splatting 94.6 80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 443GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3807 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 913 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 57 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 73 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5120842446	108% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 393 Mixed 419 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 79 4K Mixed 47.2 169% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 113 121% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 313GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 489 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 476 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 59 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 54 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3920243254	96.3% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 400 Mixed 414 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 24.9 138% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 118 122% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 134%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1498 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 485 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 26 (AE) Unknown 99 99 55 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 750 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 34 44 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 6656 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3029 (F2) Unknown 99 99 3519	183% Outstanding	Read 1,449 Write 1,187 Mixed 1,209 285% 1,282 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 28.9 165% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 45.5 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 28.9 40% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 220%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 173 5583 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1375 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1487 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 518 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 163 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 37567 (C2) HDA temperature 123 117 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	47.9% Average	Read 94.6 Write 72.2 Mixed 98.4 67% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.27 91% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	MC Read 58 MC Write 57.4 MC Mixed 53.1 160% 56.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 23.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 155%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	170x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	64x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)