Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180104
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '20 at 10:51
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 76.9 2-Core 154 52% 116 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 680 57% 495 Pts	64-Core 1,072 66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 76% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1462) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 37.1 31% 35.4 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 37 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 410 Write 348 Mixed 291 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 17.6 60% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 51.8 DQ Write 53.3 DQ Mixed 32.5 30% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB 18,723 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 154 155 154 156 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 154 Write 151 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 151 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 153 155 155 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 114 Write 133 Mixed 82 SusWrite 155 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.7 254% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 92%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB 352 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 12GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.47% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 15.5 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 13.6 23% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.47% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M1D3000C16 1x16GB 359 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 10.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 3.8 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 605 7% 605 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	345x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	125x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	73x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	57x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16