| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 17.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-A/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140624 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 07 '20 at 02:22 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.3%
Very good
|
70% 116 Pts
|
41% 306 Pts
|
18% 298 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
87.8%
Excellent
|
90% 108 fps
|
84% 106 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 48 38 54 26 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
16% 68.6 MB/s
|
33% 13.3 MB/s
|
39% 49 MB/s
|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
62GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 200 225 221 227 194 MB/s
|
32.2%
Below average
|
30% 136 MB/s
|
42% 13.5 MB/s
|
12% 16.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
414GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 160 161 162 162 MB/s
|
99.1%
Outstanding
|
105% 144 MB/s
|
173% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.4%
Above average
|
57% 19.9 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
65% 61.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-A/BR Builds (Compare 525 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 74x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 70x |
| Core i3-3250IntelBench 59%, 4,164 samples | 54x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 121x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 32x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |