Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 37.2 1-Core 53.7 2-Core 102 36% 64.5 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 128 19% 138 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 500 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Acer(1025 1211) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 25.1 16% 24.8 fps	MRender 22.7 Gravity 17.4 Splatting 26.3 18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 79 43 88 60 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 348 Write 250 Mixed 190 SusWrite 82 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 4.6 30% 9.47 MB/s	DQ Read 95.8 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 43.3 42% 66.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 55%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 890GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 95 95 96 96 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 105 Write 97.5 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 94.6 68% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 166% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:0x9E02 CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.4% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 6.6 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16