Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '20 at 08:58
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 189 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 606 60% 488 Pts	64-Core 707 44% 707 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 189 Parallax 173 108% 165 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 162 Splatting 125 112% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 110 109 113 114 114 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.8% Above average	Read 216 Write 153 Mixed 166 SusWrite 116 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 27.9 96% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 85.2 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 113 88% 117 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 75%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 195GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 140 134 222 170 143 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 182 Write 81.8 Mixed 73 SusWrite 176 29% 128 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 10 42% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 124 87% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 160 182 185 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 176 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 175 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1600C10D3/ 24GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 34.1 98% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	34x
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	31x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	23x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16