Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 58.7 2-Core 120 55% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 403 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 280 279 271 263 272 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 423 Write 303 Mixed 277 SusWrite 274 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 29.5 106% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 219 176% 248 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 4x4GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 18.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.6 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16